Pupil Premium
Pupil premium strategy statement – Yardley Primary School
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the outcomes for disadvantaged pupils last academic year.
Detail | Data |
Number of pupils in school | 420 + 60 Nursery |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils | 15.4% |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers | 2023-24 |
Date this statement was published | 13/09/2023 |
Date on which it will be reviewed | 13/09/2024 |
Statement authorised by | Chris Evans (Headteacher) |
Pupil premium lead | Susanna Odysseas (DHT) |
Governor / Trustee lead | To be appointed at next GB meeting on Oct 11th 23 as previous governor responsible for pupil premium has ended his term.
|
Funding overview
Detail | Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year | £109125 |
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year | £5000 |
Pupil premium (and recovery premium*) funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) | £0 |
Total budget for this academic year | £114125 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number | Detail of challenge |
1 | Low income families means less support and fewer opportunities for learning outside school. Less access to devices to support homework and other learning. Less support with reading at home and reduced access to reading materials. |
2 | Whilst KS2 Assessment data for 22-23 showed all disadvantaged pupils reach at least expected standard in maths, reading, GPS and writing, not as many reached greater depth level. The biggest gap was in writing where on 15% achieved the higher level compared to 39% of overall cohort |
3 | Complex family needs which have a negative effect on the emotional needs and well-being of the pupils. Disadvantaged pupils are more likely to require access to pastoral support or other outside agencies. |
4 | Low income for some families means reduced opportunities for additional activities outside of school such as holidays and trips. |
5 | Attendance for disadvantaged pupils approximately 2% worse than non-dis-advantaged pupils. Absence has a negative impact on pupil’s progress |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome | Success criteria |
For all pupils to leave at end of key stage 2 having achieved at least expected progress. | All pupils make expected progress based on the schools own internal assessments from year 2 (no national assessment data available). |
To maintain current high levels of pupil attainment for all pupils. | Pupils attainment at all key stages above national average and in line or better than previous years’ results. |
For more pupils, including disadvantaged, to reach greater depth level in writing at end of key stage 2. 100% of disadvantaged pupils reached expected standar in all subjects at end of KS2. 46% of disadvantaged pupils reached greater depth level in GPS, reading and maths but on 15% achieved greater depth in writing. | Higher percentage of KS2 pupils achieving greater depth level in writing. |
|
|
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium) funding this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £75 659
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Provision of ).4 FTE staff member to focus on KS1 phonics | Dedicated staff member working one to one with pupils to ensure secure phonic knowledge. Targeted regular practice proven to be most effective. | 1, 2, 5 |
Provision of 1 FTE teacher (50% of their time used to interventions and small group work) plus 25% of AHT’s time to provide interventions and small group work | Additional staff provide support for targeted pupils with booster and intervention groups across KS1 and KS2.
Pupil outcomes about national average at both KS1 and KS2 with 100% of disadvantaged pupils achieved expected level in all subjects at end of KS2 2022-23 | 1 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support, structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £5 000
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Small group tutoring | School has been able to provide small groups tutoring across several year groups to narrow the gap between pupils falling behind and their peers.
100% of disadvantaged pupils achieved expected level in all subjects at end of KS2 2022-23 | 1 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £37234
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Continued deployment of school pastoral support lead | Pastoral lead has worked closely with pupils to provide emotional support and strategies for several pupils to manage school day better.
She has worked with families to help improve pupil attendance
| 1, 3, 5 |
School to continue to fund all after school clubs so that they are free for all pupils. | No stigma from pupils or parents who may not be able to afford after school clubs if there was a charge.
High take up of extra curricular clubs allowing extra opportunities for all pupils regardless of background.
| 1, 3, 4, 5 |
Total budgeted cost: £ 117 893
Part B: Review of the previous academic year
Outcomes for disadvantaged pupils
National assessments in 2023 (and also in 2022 previously) show that our disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils achieve highly. Disadvantage pupils made up 21% of our 2022-23 Year cohort and 100% of these pupils achieved at least expected status in reading, maths and writing combined. This compares to a national average of 59% for all pupils. The national average includes non-disadvantaged and disadvantaged pupils together. Our strategies for inclusion and academic achievement are working. Our pupils’ achievements come in the context of a school that delivers a broad and balanced curriculum and takes the welfare, happiness and success of its pupils most seriously. While our Year 6 pupils get very excited about learning together and doing their best in their SATs, they are not overfed a restricted diet of just reading, writing and maths. Like all schools, the majority of our expenditure, including Pupil Premium funding, is on staff salaries. Significant strategic changes in expenditure happen over a period of time as a settled, confident staff is essential to our school’s success. Year on year our pupil premium expenditure is fairly consistent – the key themes are focussed intervention groups, specialist support, subsidised enrichment activities and high levels of pastoral care for the most vulnerable. Consistency is a key contributor to our success. As well as additional teachers, the employment of a school pastoral lead has improved school attendance for those pupils, whether from disadvantaged backgrounds or not, suffering from anxiety or from other issues that may have prevented them from attending school and this has a positive effect on pupil outcomes.
|